A word of warning should, however, be uttered in this connection.
The love of one’s country, instilled and stressed by the teaching of Islám,
as “an element of the Faith of God,” has not, through this declaration,
this clarion-call of Bahá’u’lláh, been either condemned or disparaged. It
should not, indeed it cannot, be construed as a repudiation, or regarded
in the light of a censure, pronounced against a sane and intelligent
patriotism, nor does it seek to undermine the allegiance and loyalty of
any individual to his country, nor does it conflict with the legitimate
aspirations, rights, and duties of any individual state or nation. All it
does imply and proclaim is the insufficiency of patriotism, in view of the
fundamental changes effected in the economic life of society and the
interdependence of the nations, and as the consequence of the contraction
of the world, through the revolution in the means of transportation
and communication—conditions that did not and could not exist either
in the days of Jesus Christ or of Muhammad. It calls for a wider loyalty,
which should not, and indeed does not, conflict with lesser loyalties. It
instills a love which, in view of its scope, must include and not exclude
the love of one’s own country. It lays, through this loyalty which it
inspires, and this love which it infuses, the only foundation on which
the concept of world citizenship can thrive, and the structure of world
unification can rest. It does insist, however, on the subordination of
national considerations and particularistic interests to the imperative
and paramount claims of humanity as a whole, inasmuch as in a world
of interdependent nations and peoples the advantage of the part is best to
be reached by the advantage of the whole.