 
A new version of the Bahá’í Reference Library is now available. This ‘old version’ of the Bahá’í Reference Library will be replaced at a later date.
The new version of the Bahá’i Reference Library can be accessed here »
| 53: THE RELATION BETWEEN GOD AND THE CREATURE202 | 
| 
     Answer.—The connection between God and the creatures 
is that of the creator to the creation; it is like the connection 
between the sun and the dark bodies of contingent 
beings, and is the connection between the maker and the 
things that he has made.  The sun in its own essence is independent 
of the bodies which it lights, for its light is in 
itself and is free and independent of the terrestrial globe; 
so the earth is under the influence of the sun and receives 
its light, whereas the sun and its rays are entirely independent 
of the earth.  But if there were no sun, the earth and all 
earthly beings could not exist.  
	 | 
| 
     The dependence of the creatures upon God is a dependence 
of emanation—that is to say, creatures emanate 
from God; they do not manifest Him.
1
  The relation is that 
of emanation and not that of manifestation.  The light of 
the sun emanates from the sun; it does not manifest it.  The 
appearance through emanation is like the appearance of 
the rays from the luminary of the horizons of the 
world—that is to say, the holy essence of the Sun of Truth 
is not divided and does not descend to the condition of the 
creatures.  In the same way, the globe of the sun does not 
become divided and does not descend to the earth.  No, the 
 
 
203
rays of the sun, which are its bounty, emanate from it and 
illumine the dark bodies.  
	 | 
| 
     But the appearance through manifestation is the manifestation 
of the branches, leaves, blossoms and fruit from 
the seed; for the seed in its own essence becomes branches 
and fruits, and its reality enters into the branches, the 
leaves and fruits.  This appearance through manifestation 
would be for God, the Most High, simple imperfection; 
and this is quite impossible, for the implication would be 
that the Absolute Preexistent is qualified with phenomenal 
attributes.  But if this were so, pure independence 
would become mere poverty, and true existence would 
become nonexistence, and this is impossible.  
	 | 
| 
     Therefore, all creatures emanate from God—that is to 
say, it is by God that all things are realized, and by Him 
that all beings have attained to existence.  The first thing 
which emanated from God is that universal reality, which 
the ancient philosophers termed the “First Mind,” and 
which the people of Bahá call the “First Will.”  This emanation, 
in that which concerns its action in the world of 
God, is not limited by time or place; it is without beginning 
or end—beginning and end in relation to God are 
one.  The preexistence of God is the preexistence of essence, 
and also preexistence of time, and the phenomenality 
of contingency is essential and not temporal, as we 
have already explained one day at table.
2
  
	 | 
| 
     Though the “First Mind” is without beginning, it does 
not become a sharer in the preexistence of God, for the 
existence of the universal reality in relation to the existence 
of God is nothingness, and it has not the power to 
become an associate of God and like unto Him in preexistence.  
This subject has been before explained.  
	 | 
| 
     The existence of living things signifies composition, 
and their death, decomposition.  But universal matter and 
the elements do not become absolutely annihilated and destroyed.  
 
 
204
No, their nonexistence is simply transformation.  
For instance, when man is annihilated, he becomes dust; 
but he does not become absolutely nonexistent.  He still 
exists in the shape of dust, but transformation has taken 
place, and this composition is accidentally decomposed.  
The annihilation of the other beings is the same, for existence 
does not become absolute nonexistence, and absolute 
nonexistence does not become existence.  
 
	 | 
| 1. | This subject, of emanation and manifestation, is more fully explained  in the following chapter.
  [  Back To Reference] | 
| 2. | Cf. “Real Preexistence,” p. 280.
  [  Back To Reference] |