A new version of the Bahá’í Reference Library is now available. This ‘old version’ of the Bahá’í Reference Library will be replaced at a later date.
The new version of the Bahá’i Reference Library can be accessed here »
“37: Question.—How many kinds of character has man, and what is the cause…” |
Answer.—He has the innate character, the inherited character, and the
acquired character which is gained by education.
13
|
With regard to the innate character, although the divine creation is
purely good, yet the varieties of natural qualities in man come from the
difference of degree; all are excellent, but they are more or less so,
according to the degree. So all mankind possess intelligence and capacities,
but the intelligence, the capacity, and the worthiness of men differ. This is
evident.
|
For example, take a number of children of one family, of one place, of one
school, instructed by one teacher, reared on the same food, in the same
climate, with the same clothing, and studying the same lessons—it is certain
that among these children some will be clever in the sciences, some will be of
average ability, and some dull. Hence it is clear that in the original nature
there exists a difference of degree and varieties of worthiness and capacity.
This difference does not imply good or evil but is simply a difference of
degree. One has the highest degree, another the medium degree, and another the
lowest degree. So man exists; the animal, the plant and the mineral exist also—but the degrees of these four existences vary. What a difference between
the existence of man and of the animal! Yet both are existences. It is
evident that in existence there are differences of degrees.
|
The variety of inherited qualities comes from strength and weakness of
constitution—that is to say, when the two parents are weak, the children
will be weak; if they are strong, the children will be robust. In the same
way, purity of blood has a great effect; for the pure germ is like the superior
stock which exists in plants and animals. For example, you see that children
born from a weak and feeble father and mother will naturally have a feeble
constitution and weak nerves; they will be afflicted and will have neither
patience, nor endurance, nor resolution, nor perseverance, and will be hasty;
for the children inherit the weakness and debility of their parents.
|
Besides this, an especial blessing is conferred on some families and some
generations. Thus it is an especial blessing that from among the descendants
of Abraham should have come all the Prophets of the children of Israel. This
is a blessing that God has granted to this descent: to Moses from his father
and mother, to Christ from his mother’s line; also to Muḥammad and the
Báb, and to all the Prophets and the Holy Manifestations of Israel. The
Blessed Beauty
1
is also a lineal descendant of Abraham, for Abraham had other
sons besides Ishmael and Isaac who in those days migrated to the lands of
Persia and Afghanistan, and the Blessed Beauty is one of their descendants.
|
Hence it is evident that inherited character also exists, and to such a
degree that if the characters are not in conformity with their origin, although
they belong physically to that lineage, spiritually they are not considered
members of the family, like Canaan,
2
who is not reckoned as being of the race
of Noah.
14
|
But the difference of the qualities with regard to culture is very great,
for education has great influence. Through education the ignorant become
learned; the cowardly become valiant. Through cultivation the crooked branch
becomes straight; the acid, bitter fruit of the mountains and woods becomes
sweet and delicious; and the five-petaled flower becomes hundred-petaled.
Through education savage nations become civilized, and even the animals become
domesticated. Education must be considered as most important, for as diseases
in the world of bodies are extremely contagious, so, in the same way, qualities
of spirit and heart are extremely contagious. Education has a universal
influence, and the differences caused by it are very great.
|
Perhaps someone will say that, since the capacity and worthiness of men
differ, therefore, the difference of capacity certainly causes the difference of
characters.
3
|
But this is not so, for capacity is of two kinds: natural capacity and
acquired capacity. The first, which is the creation of God, is purely good—in the creation of God there is no evil; but the acquired capacity has become
the cause of the appearance of evil. For example, God has created all men in
such a manner and has given them such a constitution and such capacities that
they are benefited by sugar and honey and harmed and destroyed by poison. This
nature and constitution is innate, and God has given it equally to all mankind.
But man begins little by little to accustom himself to poison by taking a small
quantity each day, and gradually increasing it, until he reaches such a point
that he cannot live without a gram of opium every day. The natural capacities
are thus completely perverted. Observe how much the natural capacity and
constitution can be changed, until by different habits and training they become
entirely perverted. One does not criticize vicious people because of their
innate capacities and nature, but rather for their acquired capacities and
nature.
|
In creation there is no evil; all is good. Certain qualities and natures
innate in some men and apparently blameworthy are not so in reality. For
example, from the beginning of his life you can see in a nursing child the
signs of greed, of anger and of temper. Then, it may be said, good and evil
are innate in the reality of man, and this is contrary to the pure goodness of
nature and creation. The answer to this is that greed, which is to ask for
something more, is a praiseworthy quality provided that it is used suitably.
So if a man is greedy to acquire science and knowledge, or to become
compassionate, generous, and just, it is most praiseworthy. If he exercises
his anger and wrath against the bloodthirsty tyrants who are like ferocious
beasts, it is very praiseworthy; but if he does not use these qualities in a
right way, they are blameworthy.
|
1. | Bahá’u’lláh [ Back To Reference] |
2. | Cf. Genesis. 9:25. [ Back To Reference] |
3. | i.e. therefore people cannot be blamed for their character. [ Back To Reference] |