A new version of the Bahá’í Reference Library is now available. This ‘old version’ of the Bahá’í Reference Library will be replaced at a later date.
The new version of the Bahá’i Reference Library can be accessed here »
Election of National Assembly |
Regarding the method to be adopted for the election of the National
Spiritual Assemblies, it is clear that the text of the Beloved’s
Testament gives us no indication as to the manner in which these
Assemblies are to be elected. In one of His earliest Tablets, however,
addressed to a friend in Persia, the following is expressly
recorded:—
|
These words clearly indicate that a three-stage election has been
provided by ‘Abdu’l-Bahá for the formation of the International
House of Justice, and as it is explicitly provided in His Will and
Testament that the “Secondary House of Justice (i.e., National
Assemblies) must elect the members of the Universal One,” it is
obvious that the members of the National Spiritual Assemblies will
have to be indirectly elected by the body of the believers in their
respective provinces. In view of these complementary instructions
the principle, set forth in my letter of March 12th, 1923, has been
established requiring the believers (the beloved of God) in every
country to elect a certain number of delegates who, in turn, will
elect their national representatives (Secondary House of Justice or
National Spiritual Assembly) whose sacred obligation and privilege
will be to elect in time God’s Universal House of Justice.
|
Should the appointing of the delegates be made a part of the
functions of local Spiritual Assemblies, who are already elected
bodies, the principle of a four-stage election would be introduced
which would be at variance with the provisions explicitly laid down
in the Master’s Tablet. On the other hand, were the local Spiritual
Assemblies, the number of whose members is strictly confined to
85
nine, to elect directly the members of the National Spiritual Assembly—thus maintaining the principle of a three-stage election—all Bahá’í localities, which must necessarily differ in numerical
strength, would then have to share equally in the election of the
National Spiritual Assembly—a practice which would be contrary
to fairness and justice. Moreover, the central principle guiding for
the present the administration of the Cause has been to make the
Bahá’í National Spiritual Assemblies as independent as possible in
the conduct of such affairs as fall within their province, and to
lessen the hampering influence of any institution within their jurisdiction
that might, whether directly or indirectly, impair their authority
and prestige.
|