A new version of the Bahá’í Reference Library is now available. This ‘old version’ of the Bahá’í Reference Library will be replaced at a later date.
The new version of the Bahá’i Reference Library can be accessed here »
Letter of May 13th, 1945 |
Regarding the matter of Mrs. … and the inharmony that
seems to exist among certain of the friends in …: when
Bahá’ís permit the dark forces of the world to enter into their
own relationships within the Faith they gravely jeopardise its
progress; it is the paramount duty of the believers, the local
assemblies, and particularly the N.S.A. to foster harmony, understanding
55
and love amongst the friends. All should be ready and
willing to set aside every personal sense of grievance—justified
or unjustified—for the good of the Cause, because the people will
never embrace it until they see in its community life mirrored
what is so conspicuously lacking in the world: love and unity.
|
The Bahá’ís are fully entitled to address criticisms to their
assemblies; they can freely air their views about policies or individual
members of elected bodies to the assembly, local or
national, but then they must whole-heartedly accept the advice
or decision of the assembly, according to the principles already
laid down for such matters in Bahá’í administration.
|
Shoghi Effendi has repeatedly stated, to believers in every
part of the world, that the individual Bahá’ís are entirely free to
write to him on any matter they please; naturally he is equally
free to answer in any manner he pleases. At the present time,
when the institutions of the Cause are just beginning to function,
he considers it essential to keep up this large correspondence,
much as it adds to his many other burdens. It is sometimes
the case that the very first intimation he receives of some
important step influencing the interests of the Faith, one way or
another, comes from an individual’s letter instead of from an
assembly; it would naturally be preferable for the information
to come from an administrative body, but whatever the source,
the Guardian is solely concerned with the welfare of the Faith,
and when he deems a certain step detrimental he states his views
in his reply. This he is at entire liberty to do.
|
Just as the National Assembly has full jurisdiction over all
its local Assemblies, the Guardian has full jurisdiction over all
National Assemblies; he is not required to consult them, if he
believes a certain decision is advisable in the interests of the
Cause. He is the judge of the wisdom and advisability of the
decisions made by these bodies, and not they of the wisdom and
advisability of his decisions. A perusal of the Will and Testament
makes this principle quite clear.
|
He always has the right to step in and countermand the
decisions of a national assembly; if he did not possess this right
56
he would be absolutely impotent to protect the Faith, just as the
N.S.A., if it were divested of the right to countermand the decisions
of a local assembly, would be incapable of watching over
and guiding the national welfare of the Bahá’í Community.
|
It very seldom happens—but it nevertheless does happen—that he feels impelled to change a major (as you put it) decision
of an N.S.A.; but he always unhesitatingly does so when necessary,
and the N.S.A. in question should gladly and unhesitatingly
accept this as a measure designed for the good of the
Faith which its elected representatives are so devotedly seeking
to serve.
|
Whatever the history of the Yerrinbool School may be, the
fact remains it is now in existence, is owned by believers ready
to have it used as such, and is known as a Bahá’í Summer School
all over the world. The Guardian is not the least concerned with
personalities in this matter, but with principles. He feels at the
present time that one Bahá’í Summer School is enough for the
believers of Australia to maintain. In the future, as assemblies
and groups multiply, the question will naturally have to be reconsidered.
|
Bahá’í Summer Schools in the United States originated in
the same informal manner as Yerrinbool; they were (and some
still are) the property of individual believers who resided on
them, but they are administered by Committees appointed by the
N.S.A. and which usually include, out of courtesy and consideration,
the owners. The American friends also desired to have
many more Summer Schools, but the Guardian has so far not
permitted them to add to the number, as it dissipates the energy
and funds of the believers and would at present weaken those
already existing.
|
He feels that the duty of your Assembly is to not give up
Yerrinbool because of any inharmony over it, but to administer
and support it properly and remove the inharmony. You should
appoint a Committee for the School, purchase any extra equipment
needed for the comfort and accommodation of the attendants,
57
and he feels sure the Boltons will cooperate with you in
this matter, as they are eager to have the property be used by
the believers.
|
Generally speaking he does not encourage the erection of
buildings in memory to individual believers at the present time.
But as those at Yerrinbool serve a useful purpose and that the
memory of dear Father Dunn commemorates the life of the man
who brought the Faith to the Continent of Australia, we may
welcome it in the spirit it was given.
|