A new version of the Bahá’í Reference Library is now available. This ‘old version’ of the Bahá’í Reference Library will be replaced at a later date.
The new version of the Bahá’i Reference Library can be accessed here »
The Rise of Bolshevism |
The rise of Bolshevism, born amidst the fires of that inconclusive
struggle, shook the throne of the Czars and overthrew it. Alexander II
Nicolaevich, whom Bahá’u’lláh had commanded in His Tablet to “arise
… and summon the nations unto God,” who had been thrice warned:
56
“beware lest thy desire deter thee from turning towards the face of thy
Lord,” “beware lest thou barter away this sublime station,” “beware lest
thy sovereignty withhold thee from Him Who is the Supreme Sovereign,”
was not indeed the last of the Czars to rule his country, but rather the
inaugurator of a retrogressive policy which in the end proved fatal to
both himself and his dynasty.
|
In the latter part of his reign he initiated a reactionary policy which,
causing widespread disillusionment, gave rise to Nihilism, which, as it
spread, ushered in a period of terrorism of unexampled violence, leading
in its turn to several attempts on his life, and culminating in his
assassination. Stern repression guided the policy of his successor, Alexander
III, who “assumed an attitude of defiant hostility to innovators
and liberals.” The tradition of unqualified absolutism, of extreme
religious orthodoxy was maintained by the still more severe Nicolas II,
the last of the Czars, who, guided by the counsels of a man who was “the
very incarnation of a narrow-minded, stiff-necked despotism,” and
aided by a corrupt bureaucracy, and humiliated by the disastrous effects
of a foreign war, increased the general discontent of the masses, both
intellectuals and peasants. Driven for a time into subterranean channels,
and intensified by military reverses, it exploded at last in the midst
of the Great War, in the form of a Revolution which, in the principles it
challenged, the institutions it subverted, and the havoc it wrought, has
scarcely a parallel in modern history.
|
A great trembling seized and rocked the foundations of that country.
The light of religion was dimmed. Ecclesiastical institutions of every
denomination were swept away. The state religion was disendowed,
persecuted, and abolished. A far-flung empire was dismembered. A
militant, triumphant proletariat exiled the intellectuals, and plundered
and massacred the nobility. Civil war and disease decimated a population,
already in the throes of agony and despair. And, finally, the Chief
Magistrate of a mighty dominion, together with his consort, and his
family, and his dynasty, were swept into the vortex of this great convulsion,
and perished.
|
The very ordeal that heaped such dire misfortunes on the empire of
the Czars brought about, in its concluding stages, the fall of the almighty
German Kaiser as well as that of the inheritor of the once famed
Holy Roman Empire. It shattered the whole fabric of Imperial Germany,
57
which arose out of the disaster that engulfed the Napoleonic
dynasty, and dealt the Dual Monarchy its death blow.
|
Almost half a century before, Bahá’u’lláh, Who had predicted, in
clear and resounding terms, the ignominious fall of the successor of the
great Napoleon, had, in the Kitáb-i-Aqdas, addressed to Kaiser William
I, the newly acclaimed victor, a no less significant warning, and
prophesied, in His apostrophe to the banks of the Rhine, in words
equally unambiguous, the mourning that would afflict the capital of the
newly federated empire.
|
“Do thou remember,” Bahá’u’lláh thus addressed him, “the one
[Napoleon] whose power transcended thy power, and whose station
excelled thy station…. Think deeply, O king, concerning him, and
concerning them who, like unto thee, have conquered cities and ruled
over men.” And again: “O banks of the Rhine! We have seen you covered
with gore, inasmuch as the swords of retribution were drawn against you;
and you shall have another turn. And We hear the lamentations of
Berlin, though she be today in conspicuous glory.”
|
On him who, in his old age, sustained two attempts upon his life by
the advocates of the rising tide of socialism; on his son Frederick III,
whose three months’ reign was overshadowed by mortal disease; and
finally on his grandson, William II, the self-willed and overweening
monarch and wrecker of his own empire—on these fell, in varying
degrees, the full weight of the responsibilities consequent to these dire
pronouncements.
|
William I, first German Emperor and seventh king of Prussia, whose
entire lifetime had, up to the date of his accession, been spent in the
army, was a militaristic, autocratic ruler, imbued with antiquated ideas,
who initiated, with the aid of a statesman rightly regarded as “one of the
geniuses of his century,” a policy which may be said to have inaugurated
a new era not only for Prussia but for the world. This policy was pursued
with characteristic thoroughness and perfected through the repressive
measures that were taken to safeguard and uphold it, through the wars
that were waged for its realization, and the political combinations that
were subsequently formed to exalt and consolidate it, combinations that
were fraught with such dreadful consequences to the European continent.
|
William II, temperamentally dictatorial, politically inexperienced,
58
militarily aggressive, religiously insincere, posed as the apostle of European
peace, yet actually insisted on “the mailed fist” and “the shining
armor.” Irresponsible, indiscreet, inordinately ambitious, his first act
was to dismiss that sagacious statesman, the true founder of his empire,
to whose sagacity Bahá’u’lláh had paid tribute, and to the unwisdom of
whose imperial and ungrateful master ‘Abdu’l-Bahá had testified. War
indeed became a religion of his country, and by enlarging the scope of
his multifarious activities, he proceeded to prepare the way for that final
catastrophe that was to dethrone him and his dynasty. And when the war
broke out, and the might of his armies seemed to have overpowered his
adversaries, and the news of his triumphs was noised abroad, reverberating
as far as Persia, voices were raised ridiculing those passages of the
Kitáb-i-Aqdas which so clearly foreshadowed the misfortunes that were
to befall his capital. Suddenly, however, swift and unforeseen reverses
fatally overtook him. Revolution broke out. William II, deserting his
armies, fled ignominiously to Holland, followed by the Crown Prince.
The princes of the German states abdicated. A period of chaos ensued.
The communist flag was hoisted in the capital, which became a caldron
of confusion and civil strife. The Kaiser signed his abdication. The
Constitution of Weimar established the Republic, bringing the tremendous
structure, so elaborately reared through a policy of blood and
iron, crashing to the ground. All the efforts to that end, which through
internal legislation and foreign wars had, ever since the accession of
William I to the Prussian throne, been assiduously exerted, came to
naught. “The lamentations of Berlin,” tortured by the terms of a treaty
monstrous in its severity, were raised, contrasting with the hilarious
shouts of victory that rang, half a century before, in the Hall of Mirrors
of the Palace of Versailles.
|
The Hapsburg monarch, heir of centuries of glorious history,
simultaneously toppled from his throne. It was Francis Joseph, whom
Bahá’u’lláh chided in the Kitáb-i-Aqdas for having failed in his duty to
investigate His Cause, let alone to seek His presence, when so easily
accessible to him in the course of his visit to the Holy Land. “Thou
passed Him by,” He thus reproves the pilgrim-emperor, “and inquired
not about Him…. We have been with thee at all times, and found thee
clinging unto the Branch and heedless of the Root…. Open thine eyes,
that thou mayest behold this Glorious Vision and recognize Him Whom
59
thou invokest in the daytime and in the night season, and gaze on the
Light that shineth above this luminous Horizon.”
|
The House of Hapsburg, in which the Imperial Title had remained
practically hereditary for almost five centuries, was, ever since those
words were uttered, being increasingly menaced by the forces of internal
disintegration, and was sowing the seeds of an external conflict, to both
of which it ultimately succumbed. Francis Joseph, Emperor of Austria,
King of Hungary, a reactionary ruler, reestablished old abuses, ignored
the rights of nationalities, and restored that bureaucratic centralization
that proved in the end so injurious to his empire. Repeated tragedies
darkened his reign. His brother Maximilian was shot in Mexico. The
Crown Prince Rudolph perished in a dishonorable affair. The Empress
was assassinated in Geneva. Archduke Francis Ferdinand and his wife
were murdered in Sarajevo, kindling a war in the midst of which the
Emperor himself died, closing a reign which is unsurpassed by any other
reign in the disasters it brought to the nation.
|